Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 9 Sep 2014 11:38:05 -0700 | From | Nicolin Chen <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH V1] ASoC: fsl_ssi: refine ipg clock usage in this module |
| |
On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 05:18:07PM +0800, Shengjiu Wang wrote: > @@ -1321,7 +1333,11 @@ static int fsl_ssi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > return -ENOMEM; > } > > - ssi_private->regs = devm_regmap_init_mmio(&pdev->dev, iomem, > + if (ssi_private->soc->imx) > + ssi_private->regs = devm_regmap_init_mmio_clk(&pdev->dev, > + "ipg", iomem, &fsl_ssi_regconfig); > + else > + ssi_private->regs = devm_regmap_init_mmio(&pdev->dev, iomem,
As Markus mentioned, the key point here is to be compatible with those non-clock-name platforms.
I think it would be safer to keep the current code while adding an extra clk_disable_unprepare() at the end of probe() as a common routine. And meantime, make sure to have the call for imx only because it seems that the other platforms do not depend on the clock. //a bit guessing here :)
Then we can get a patch like: open() { + clk_prepare_enable(); .... }
close() { .... + clk_disable_unprepare() }
probe() { clk_get(); clk_prepare_enable(); .... if (xxx) - goto err_xx; + return ret; .... + clk_disable_unprepare(); return 0; -err_xx: - clk_disable_unprepare() }
remove() { .... - clk_disable_unprepare() }
As long as you make the subject clear as 'Don't enable core/ipg clock when SSI's idle', I'm sure you can make them within a single patch.
And an alternative way for open() and close() is to put those code into pm_runtime_resume/suspend() instead (since we might have some internal code need to be added by using pm_runtime as well), which would make the further code neater IMO.
Thank you Nicolin
| |