lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Sep]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] scsi_debug: deadlock between completions and surprise module removal
On 14-09-05 11:25 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 09/05/14 15:56, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
>> With scsi-mq I think many LLDs probably have a new
>> race possibility between a surprise rmmod of the LLD
>> and another thread presenting a new command at about
>> the same time (or another thread's command completing
>> around that time). Does anything above the LLD stop
>> this happening?
>>
>> Looking at mpt3sas and hpsa module exit calls, they don't
>> seem to guard against this possibility.
>>
>> The test is pretty easy: build the LLD as a module, load
>> it and fire up a multi-thread, libaio fio test on one or
>> more devices (SSDs would probably be good) on that LLD.
>> While the test is running, do 'rmmod LLD'.
>
> An LLD must call scsi_remove_host() directly or indirectly from the module
> cleanup path. scsi_remove_host() triggers a call to blk_cleanup_queue(). That
> last function sets the flag QUEUE_FLAG_DYING which prevents that new I/O is
> queued and waits until previously queued requests have finished before returning.

And they do call scsi_remove_host(). But they do that toward
the end of their clean-up. The problem that I observed has
already happened before that.

IOW I think the QUEUE_FLAG_DYING state needs to be set and
acknowledged as the first order of business by the code
that implements 'rmmod LLD'.

Doug Gilbert


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-09-06 17:01    [W:0.255 / U:0.032 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site