Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 22 Sep 2014 23:38:19 +0100 | From | Matthew Garrett <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v4 18/18] Documentation: ACPI for ARM64 |
| |
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 06:34:42AM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote: > On Sep 23, 2014, 06:28AM, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 12:46:24AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >> On Monday, September 22, 2014 09:31:36 PM Matthew Garrett wrote: > >>> Explicit Change Request. These can only be filed by paid-up members of > >>> the UEFI Forum, so I suspect this requirement is going to be unworkable > >>> (there's plenty of ACPI support code for large x86 vendors which isn't > >>> part of any ACPI spec). > >> Why do you think so? > > The IP rules in the membership agreements. > > If I'm not mistaken, I think there is no IP issues for the _DSD bindings, > it just some key value pairs.
That paragraph is talking about ACPI support in general, not just the _DSD code.
-- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org
| |