Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 22 Sep 2014 16:59:39 -0400 | From | Richard Guy Briggs <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] selinux: hooks: cleanup orphan keywords in audit log text |
| |
On 14/09/22, Paul Moore wrote: > On Thursday, September 18, 2014 08:50:17 PM Richard Guy Briggs wrote: > > Convert audit_log() call to WARN_ONCE(). > > > > Rename "type=" to nlmsg_type=" to avoid confusion with the audit record > > type. > > > > Added "protocol=" to help track down which protocol (NETLINK_AUDIT?) was > > used within the netlink protocol family. > > > > Signed-off-by: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com> > > --- > > security/selinux/hooks.c | 7 +++---- > > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > I rewrote the patch subject line as it doesn't really make much sense given > the changes made by the patch, but other than that it looks fine to me.
Fair enough. What's the new patch subject line?
> Applied.
Thanks.
> > diff --git a/security/selinux/hooks.c b/security/selinux/hooks.c > > index 83d06db..28ec61c 100644 > > --- a/security/selinux/hooks.c > > +++ b/security/selinux/hooks.c > > @@ -4681,10 +4681,9 @@ static int selinux_nlmsg_perm(struct sock *sk, struct > > sk_buff *skb) err = selinux_nlmsg_lookup(sksec->sclass, nlh->nlmsg_type, > > &perm); if (err) { > > if (err == -EINVAL) { > > - audit_log(current->audit_context, GFP_KERNEL, > AUDIT_SELINUX_ERR, > > - "SELinux: unrecognized netlink message" > > - " type=%hu for sclass=%hu\n", > > - nlh->nlmsg_type, sksec->sclass); > > + WARN_ONCE(1, "selinux_nlmsg_perm: unrecognized netlink > message:" > > + " protocol=%hu nlmsg_type=%hu sclass=%hu\n", > > + sk->sk_protocol, nlh->nlmsg_type, sksec->sclass); > > if (!selinux_enforcing || security_get_allow_unknown()) > > err = 0; > > } > > paul moore
- RGB
-- Richard Guy Briggs <rbriggs@redhat.com> Senior Software Engineer, Kernel Security, AMER ENG Base Operating Systems, Red Hat Remote, Ottawa, Canada Voice: +1.647.777.2635, Internal: (81) 32635, Alt: +1.613.693.0684x3545
| |