Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Subject | [PATCH v2 3/6] sched: Use dl_bw_of() under RCU read lock | From | Kirill Tkhai <> | Date | Mon, 22 Sep 2014 22:32:16 +0400 |
| |
From: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@parallels.com>
dl_bw_of() dereferences rq->rd which has to have RCU read lock held. Probability of use-after-free isn't zero here.
Also add lockdep assert into dl_bw_cpus().
Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@parallels.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.14+ --- kernel/sched/core.c | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c index 5b864e9..a300fce 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/core.c +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c @@ -1989,6 +1989,8 @@ unsigned long to_ratio(u64 period, u64 runtime) #ifdef CONFIG_SMP inline struct dl_bw *dl_bw_of(int i) { + rcu_lockdep_assert(rcu_read_lock_sched_held(), + "sched RCU must be held"); return &cpu_rq(i)->rd->dl_bw; } @@ -1997,6 +1999,8 @@ static inline int dl_bw_cpus(int i) struct root_domain *rd = cpu_rq(i)->rd; int cpus = 0; + rcu_lockdep_assert(rcu_read_lock_sched_held(), + "sched RCU must be held"); for_each_cpu_and(i, rd->span, cpu_active_mask) cpus++; @@ -7623,6 +7627,8 @@ static int sched_dl_global_constraints(void) int cpu, ret = 0; unsigned long flags; + rcu_read_lock(); + /* * Here we want to check the bandwidth not being set to some * value smaller than the currently allocated bandwidth in @@ -7644,6 +7650,8 @@ static int sched_dl_global_constraints(void) break; } + rcu_read_unlock(); + return ret; } @@ -7659,6 +7667,7 @@ static void sched_dl_do_global(void) if (global_rt_runtime() != RUNTIME_INF) new_bw = to_ratio(global_rt_period(), global_rt_runtime()); + rcu_read_lock(); /* * FIXME: As above... */ @@ -7669,6 +7678,7 @@ static void sched_dl_do_global(void) dl_b->bw = new_bw; raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dl_b->lock, flags); } + rcu_read_unlock(); } static int sched_rt_global_validate(void)
| |