Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Subject | [PATCH 3.17-rc5] Fix confusing PFA_NO_NEW_PRIVS constant. | From | Tetsuo Handa <> | Date | Sat, 20 Sep 2014 19:40:30 +0900 |
| |
Can you apply below patch before new PFA_* are defined? Cgroups code might want to define PFA_SPREAD_PAGE as 1 and PFA_SPREAD_SLAB as 2. ---------------------------------------- >From 8543e68adb210142fa347d8bc9d83df0bb2c5291 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2014 19:24:23 +0900 Subject: [PATCH 3.17-rc5] Fix confusing PFA_NO_NEW_PRIVS constant.
Commit 1d4457f99928 ("sched: move no_new_privs into new atomic flags") defined PFA_NO_NEW_PRIVS as hexadecimal value, but it is confusing because it is used as bit number. Redefine it as decimal bit number.
Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> --- include/linux/sched.h | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h index 5c2c885..4557765 100644 --- a/include/linux/sched.h +++ b/include/linux/sched.h @@ -1957,7 +1957,7 @@ static inline void memalloc_noio_restore(unsigned int flags) } /* Per-process atomic flags. */ -#define PFA_NO_NEW_PRIVS 0x00000001 /* May not gain new privileges. */ +#define PFA_NO_NEW_PRIVS 0 /* May not gain new privileges. */ static inline bool task_no_new_privs(struct task_struct *p) { -- 1.7.1
| |