Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 19 Sep 2014 12:22:57 -0400 | From | Chris Mason <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Move BTRFS RCU string to common library |
| |
On 09/19/2014 12:05 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 11:47:53AM -0400, Chris Mason wrote: >> >> >> On 09/19/2014 11:45 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote: >>> On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 02:01:28AM -0700, Omar Sandoval wrote: >>>> This patch series moves the generic RCU string library used internally by BTRFS >>>> to be accessible by anyone. It provides printk_in_rcu and >>>> printk_ratelimited_in_rcu to print these strings. In order to avoid a weird >>>> inconsistency between the two, the first patch fixes printk_ratelimited so it >>>> passes on the return value from printk. >>>> >>>> The second patch actually moves the RCU string library. Version 2 passes on the >>>> return values from printk{,_ratelimited} and fixes some style issues. >>>> >>>> Omar Sandoval (2): >>> >>> For the series: >>> >>> Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> >> >> Fine by me too, Paul, do you want to merge it in? > > I would be happy to. > > Are you thinking in terms of 3.18 or 3.19? These look OK either way, but > thought I should check.
Either way is fine with me. Actually this will have minor conflicts with my current branch headed for-next, so I can resolve and send as a stand alone pull.
-chris
| |