Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 18 Sep 2014 19:34:14 +0200 | From | Peter Zijlstra <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] printk: git rid of [sched_delayed] message for printk_deferred |
| |
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 08:31:35PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > I totally didn't get what you wrote.
:-)
> We don't want to know if it got delayed, then the patch to remove that > print seems correct.
Why would you not want to know that? Also was that the actual argument? Lemme go check the earlier emails -- I cannot find that argument in the first few emails.
> But how did it get delayed if we don't know if it got delayed and > don't want to know?
If you cannot prove something didn't happen it must have happened :-)
> Are my meds still that strong???
Either that or I'm just incoherent, I get that while traveling.
| |