Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 17 Sep 2014 18:18:46 +0300 | From | Or Gerlitz <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v1 for-next 00/16] On demand paging |
| |
On 9/13/2014 12:16 AM, Or Gerlitz wrote: > Per your request we provided the information on tests conducted with > the patches. > > Note that the patches can't really disrupt existing applications that > don't set the new IB_ACCESS_ON_DEMAND MR flag when they register > memory. Also the whole set of changes to the umem area is dependent on building with > CONFIG_INFINIBAND_ON_DEMAND_PAGING -- all in all, everything is in > place for protecting against potential regression that this series > could introduce. > > As you didn't provide any feedback for > six months, and we have all > the above in place (report on stability tests, performance data and > mechanics to avoid regressions) I think it would be fair to get this > picked for the coming merge window, thoughts?
Roland,
Can you please comment here, not only that you didn't provide any feedback on the patches, you are even not willing to respond if the the data we gave addresses your questions on testing and performance. Are you planning to pick this to the next merge window?
Or.
| |