Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 01 Sep 2014 09:46:42 -0700 | From | Guenter Roeck <> | Subject | Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 23 |
| |
On 09/01/2014 08:58 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 09:57:41PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: >> On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 08:04:22AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Changes since 20140822: >>> >>> The mfd tree gained a build failure so I used the version from >>> next-20140822. >>> >>> The usb-gadget tree gained a conflict against the usb-gadget-fixes tree. >>> >>> The pwm tree gained a build failure for which I reverted a couple of >>> commits. >>> >>> The staging tree still had its build failure for which I applied a >>> fix patch. >>> >>> Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 1435 >>> 1372 files changed, 34371 insertions(+), 25442 deletions(-) >>> >> >> Images build from this tree crash in mips, mips64, and sparc64 qemu tests >> with memory allocation errors. For mips, bisect points to commit ef31563e950c >> (locking,arch,mips: Fold atomic_ops). >> >> # bad: [eeed658b5a92d957aab7bdb7c469a90016420c7d] Add linux-next specific files for 20140823 >> # good: [7d1311b93e58ed55f3a31cc8f94c4b8fe988a2b9] Linux 3.17-rc1 >> git bisect start 'HEAD' 'v3.17-rc1' >> # good: [a364ac83d553cd223cf1b898a738594f866242ac] Merge remote-tracking branch 'input/next' >> git bisect good a364ac83d553cd223cf1b898a738594f866242ac >> # bad: [6804e0868ce1f5f55a16270de65587e35b80231e] Merge remote-tracking branch 'usb-gadget/next' >> git bisect bad 6804e0868ce1f5f55a16270de65587e35b80231e >> # bad: [8590e100eca66f5763b4c8a5775e38e4a0c9939d] Merge branch 'x86/xsave' >> git bisect bad 8590e100eca66f5763b4c8a5775e38e4a0c9939d >> # good: [e71e79457b79a52827039d9d7f253321bfd342bd] perf symbols: Don't demangle parameters and such by default >> git bisect good e71e79457b79a52827039d9d7f253321bfd342bd >> # bad: [100b1cb29333c8ac37e68025b291e4b273c8ad43] Merge branch 'locking/core' >> git bisect bad 100b1cb29333c8ac37e68025b291e4b273c8ad43 >> # bad: [c6470150dff9aff682063890c9b8eac71b695def] locking,arch,sh: Fold atomic_ops >> git bisect bad c6470150dff9aff682063890c9b8eac71b695def >> # good: [50f853e38b0b90a5703ab14b70e20eb5a8ccd5de] locking,arch,hexagon: Fold atomic_ops >> git bisect good 50f853e38b0b90a5703ab14b70e20eb5a8ccd5de >> # good: [d6dfe2509da935a15583cace7cd3837b1e8addef] locking,arch,metag: Fold atomic_ops >> git bisect good d6dfe2509da935a15583cace7cd3837b1e8addef >> # bad: [e69a0ef76627005e3e83d0e086e6bb1d247bb65b] locking,arch,mn10300: Fold atomic_ops >> git bisect bad e69a0ef76627005e3e83d0e086e6bb1d247bb65b >> # bad: [ef31563e950c60bb41b97c2b61c32de874f3c949] locking,arch,mips: Fold atomic_ops >> git bisect bad ef31563e950c60bb41b97c2b61c32de874f3c949 >> # first bad commit: [ef31563e950c60bb41b97c2b61c32de874f3c949] locking,arch,mips: Fold atomic_ops >> >> Reverting the first bad commit fixes the problem for mips and mips64. >> >> For sparc64, given the above, I did not bother to bisect, but just reverted >> commit 4f3316c (locking,arch,sparc: Fold atomic_ops). This fixes the problem >> for sparc64. > > Urgh, I take it this is still current? Would you perhaps have these qemu > images available so I can try and fix this? > > Yes, the problem is still seen in next-140829. See qemu test results at http://server.roeck-us.net:8010/builders.
I provided sparc64 images at http://server.roeck-us.net/qemu/sparc64/. The README file includes instructions on how to run the image in qemu and how to build a kernel.
I can do the same for mips and mips64 if needed; let me know.
Thanks, Guenter
| |