Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH RFC] sched: deferred set priority (dprio) | From | Mike Galbraith <> | Date | Sun, 10 Aug 2014 05:13:23 +0200 |
| |
On Sat, 2014-08-09 at 20:04 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > > NAK. There it is, my imaginary NAK to imaginary realtime priorities :) > > Ok, but do you have any alternative proposal yourself how to solve the > lockholder preemption problem? I assume you agree it's a real problem. > > Just being negative is not very constructive.
I both acknowledged the problem problem, and made alternative suggestions.
-Mike
| |