lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Aug]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/2] Drivers: scsi: storvsc: Force discovery of LUNs that may have been removed.
On 08/29/2014 09:39 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 08/29/14 08:19, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>> On 08/29/2014 04:42 AM, Mike Christie wrote:
>>> How are distros handling 0x6/0x3f/0x0e (report luns changed) when it
>>> gets passed to userspace? Is everyone kicking off a new full (add and
>>> delete) scan to handle this or logging it? Is the driver returning this
>>> when the LUNs change?
>>>
>> Currently it's logged to userspace and ignored.
>> Doing an automated rescan has proven to be dangerous, as it
>> might disconnect any LUNs which are still in use by applications.
>> Especially HA or database setups tends to become very annoyed
>> when you do an automated rescan.
>
> Has it already been considered to add newly discovered LUNs
> automatically and to leave it to the user to remove stale LUNs manually
> ? That would be similar to what the rescan-scsi-bus.sh script does
> without option -r/--remove.
>

As of now we're still missing an in-kernel infrastructure which
would allow us to react on any sense codes; currently we're relying
on the administrator to setup a udev rule here.

Cheers,

Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke zSeries & Storage
hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: J. Hawn, J. Guild, F. Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-08-29 10:21    [W:0.057 / U:1.560 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site