lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Aug]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH] mmc:sdhci: handle busy-end interrupt during command
From
On 21 August 2014 09:26, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 21 August 2014 03:53, Chanho Min <chanho.min@lge.com> wrote:
>> It is fully legal for a controller to start handling busy-end interrupt
>> before it has signaled that the command has completed. So make sure
>> we do things in the proper order, Or it results that command interrupt
>> is ignored so it can cause unexpected operations. This is founded at some
>> toshiba emmc with the bellow warning.
>>
>> "mmc0: Got command interrupt 0x00000001 even though
>> no command operation was in progress."
>>
>> This issue has been also reported by Youssef TRIKI:
>> It is not specific to Toshiba devices, and happens with eMMC devices
>> as well as SD card which support Auto-CMD12 rather than CMD23.
>>
>> Also, similar patch is submitted by:
>> Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@chromium.org>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hankyung Yu <hankyung.yu@lge.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Chanho Min <chanho.min@lge.com>
>> Tested-by: Youssef TRIKI <youssef.triki@st.com>
>
> Hi Chanho,
>
> This patch has been around for quite some time, sorry for lack of
> response. Appreciate if we could get this tested on a few more
> variants of sdhci, I am not able to test myself.
>
> I plan to queue this for 3.18, unless someone objects soon.

Hi Chanho,

I was about to apply this one, but I am hitting a conflict. Even if
wasn't too hard for me to resolve it, I think it might need an extra
round of testing. Could you please re-spin and send a new version?

Kind regards
Uffe


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-08-29 13:41    [W:0.038 / U:1.396 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site