Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Date | Thu, 21 Aug 2014 22:31:10 +0200 | From | Radim Krčmář <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] KVM: add kvm_arch_sched_in |
| |
2014-08-22 00:19+0530, Raghavendra K T: > On 08/21/2014 09:38 PM, Radim Krčmář wrote: > >Introduce preempt notifiers for architecture specific code. > >Advantage over creating a new notifier in every arch is slightly simpler > >code and guaranteed call order with respect to kvm_sched_in. > > > >Signed-off-by: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com> > >--- > > Reviewed-by: Raghavendra KT <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > No surprise that ia64 doesn't show here :).
Oh, totally forgot about its predicted comeback ... Paolo, do you want to fixup this? (It removes double newline.)
diff --git a/arch/ia64/kvm/kvm-ia64.c b/arch/ia64/kvm/kvm-ia64.c index 0729ba6..1630624 100644 --- a/arch/ia64/kvm/kvm-ia64.c +++ b/arch/ia64/kvm/kvm-ia64.c @@ -1468,6 +1468,9 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_uninit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) kfree(vcpu->arch.apic); } +void kvm_arch_sched_in(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) +{ +} long kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl(struct file *filp, unsigned int ioctl, unsigned long arg) > and I also would have liked > static inlines (as indicated by Paolo).
I'll send a patch that converts empty functions into static inlines, maybe return-0s too, soon(ish). -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |