Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 18 Aug 2014 10:19:42 +0900 | From | Gioh Kim <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/2] fs/buffer.c: allocate buffer cache from non-movable area |
| |
2014-08-15 오전 6:22, Andrew Morton 쓴 글: > On Thu, 14 Aug 2014 14:15:40 +0900 Gioh Kim <gioh.kim@lge.com> wrote: > >> A buffer cache is allocated from movable area >> because it is referred for a while and released soon. >> But some filesystems are taking buffer cache for a long time >> and it can disturb page migration. >> >> A new API should be introduced to allocate buffer cache from >> non-movable area. > > I think the API could and should be more flexible than this. > > Rather than making the API be "movable or not movable", let's permit > callers to specify the gfp_t and leave it at that. That way, if > someone later wants to allocate a buffer head with, I dunno, > __GFP_NOTRACK then they can do so. > > So the word "movable" shouldn't appear in buffer.c at all, except in a > single place.
Absolutely I agree with you. If filesystem developers agree this patch I will send 2nd patch that applies your ideas.
Thank you for your advices.
> >> --- a/fs/buffer.c >> +++ b/fs/buffer.c >> @@ -993,7 +993,7 @@ init_page_buffers(struct page *page, struct block_device *bdev, >> */ >> static int >> grow_dev_page(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t block, >> - pgoff_t index, int size, int sizebits) >> + pgoff_t index, int size, int sizebits, gfp_t movable_mask) > > s/movable_mask/gfp/
I got it.
> >> { >> struct inode *inode = bdev->bd_inode; >> struct page *page; >> @@ -1003,7 +1003,8 @@ grow_dev_page(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t block, >> gfp_t gfp_mask; >> >> gfp_mask = mapping_gfp_mask(inode->i_mapping) & ~__GFP_FS; >> - gfp_mask |= __GFP_MOVABLE; >> + if (movable_mask & __GFP_MOVABLE) >> + gfp_mask |= __GFP_MOVABLE; > > This becomes > > gfp_mask |= gfp;
I got it.
> >> /* >> * XXX: __getblk_slow() can not really deal with failure and >> * will endlessly loop on improvised global reclaim. Prefer >> @@ -1058,7 +1059,8 @@ failed: >> * that page was dirty, the buffers are set dirty also. >> */ >> static int >> -grow_buffers(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t block, int size) >> +grow_buffers(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t block, >> + int size, gfp_t movable_mask) > > gfp > >> { >> pgoff_t index; >> int sizebits; >> @@ -1085,11 +1087,12 @@ grow_buffers(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t block, int size) >> } >> >> /* Create a page with the proper size buffers.. */ >> - return grow_dev_page(bdev, block, index, size, sizebits); >> + return grow_dev_page(bdev, block, index, size, sizebits, movable_mask); >> } >> >> static struct buffer_head * >> -__getblk_slow(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t block, int size) >> +__getblk_slow(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t block, >> + int size, gfp_t movable_mask) > > gfp > >> { >> /* Size must be multiple of hard sectorsize */ >> if (unlikely(size & (bdev_logical_block_size(bdev)-1) || >> @@ -1111,7 +1114,7 @@ __getblk_slow(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t block, int size) >> if (bh) >> return bh; >> >> - ret = grow_buffers(bdev, block, size); >> + ret = grow_buffers(bdev, block, size, movable_mask); > > gfp > >> if (ret < 0) >> return NULL; >> if (ret == 0) >> @@ -1385,11 +1388,34 @@ __getblk(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t block, unsigned size) >> >> might_sleep(); >> if (bh == NULL) >> - bh = __getblk_slow(bdev, block, size); >> + bh = __getblk_slow(bdev, block, size, __GFP_MOVABLE); > > Here is the place where buffer.c. mentions "movable".
I got it.
> >> return bh; >> } >> EXPORT_SYMBOL(__getblk); >> >> + /* >> + * __getblk_nonmovable will locate (and, if necessary, create) the buffer_head >> + * which corresponds to the passed block_device, block and size. The >> + * returned buffer has its reference count incremented. >> + * >> + * The page cache is allocated from non-movable area >> + * not to prevent page migration. >> + * >> + * __getblk()_nonmovable will lock up the machine >> + * if grow_dev_page's try_to_free_buffers() attempt is failing. FIXME, perhaps? >> + */ >> +struct buffer_head * >> +__getblk_nonmovable(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t block, unsigned size) >> +{ >> + struct buffer_head *bh = __find_get_block(bdev, block, size); >> + >> + might_sleep(); >> + if (bh == NULL) >> + bh = __getblk_slow(bdev, block, size, 0); >> + return bh; >> +} >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(__getblk_nonmovable); > > Suggest this be called __getblk_gfp(bdev, block, size, gfp) and then > __getblk() be changed to call __getblk_gfp(..., __GFP_MOVABLE). > > We could then write a __getblk_nonmovable() which calls __getblk_gfp() > (a static inlined one-line function) or we can just call > __getblk_gfp(..., 0) directly from filesystems.
I got it.
> >> @@ -1423,6 +1450,28 @@ __bread(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t block, unsigned size) >> } >> EXPORT_SYMBOL(__bread); >> >> +/** >> + * __bread_nonmovable() - reads a specified block and returns the bh >> + * @bdev: the block_device to read from >> + * @block: number of block >> + * @size: size (in bytes) to read >> + * >> + * Reads a specified block, and returns buffer head that contains it. >> + * The page cache is allocated from non-movable area >> + * not to prevent page migration. >> + * It returns NULL if the block was unreadable. >> + */ >> +struct buffer_head * >> +__bread_nonmovable(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t block, unsigned size) >> +{ >> + struct buffer_head *bh = __getblk_slow(bdev, block, size, 0); >> + >> + if (likely(bh) && !buffer_uptodate(bh)) >> + bh = __bread_slow(bh); >> + return bh; >> +} >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(__bread_nonmovable); > > Treat this in the same fashion as __getblk_nonmovable().
I got it.
> > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |