lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Aug]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v5 tip/core/rcu 15/16] rcu: Make RCU-tasks wait for idle tasks
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 09:43:05AM -0700, Jacob Pan wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Aug 2014 18:30:15 +0200
> Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 07:43:32AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > o drivers/acpi/acpi_pad.c, power_saving_thread().
> > >
> > > Looks like a kthread that does idle injection. Currently,
> > > RCU sees it as not a quiescent state. Would it kill these guys to
> > > put in a comment or two about what this is for???
> > >
> > > So adding rcu_idle_enter() and rcu_idle_exit() here might
> > > actually fix a bug, though it is not clear how long this
> > > thing actually runs. If only for a few milliseconds, no harm done.
> > >
> >
> > > o drivers/thermal/intel_powerclamp.c, clamp_thread().
> > >
> > > Looks similar to power_saving_thread(), but for thermal
> > > control. Probably short term, shouldn't be a problem either way.
> > >
> >
> > There's patches somewhere that make that go-away
> >
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/6/4/56
> >
> > Jacob was going to look at that.
>
> yes, it is on my plate, plan to submit for 3.18. the idle period is
> only for a few miliseconds, default to 6ms.

OK, 6ms shouldn't be a problem. But if you want much longer, you
will need to do rcu_idle_enter() and rcu_idle_exit(). Of course, if
you are getting rid of this entirely, no need to worry -- though the
patch looks like it just uses a different idle loop.

Thanx, Paul



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-08-13 20:41    [W:0.058 / U:2.768 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site