lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Aug]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH 07/20] x86/MSI: Use msi_chip instead of arch func to configure MSI/MSI-X
On 2014/8/13 3:09, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 03:26:00PM +0800, Yijing Wang wrote:
>> Introduce a new struct msi_chip apic_msi_chip instead of weak arch
>> functions to configure MSI/MSI-X in x86.
>
> Why not 'x86_msi_ops' (see arch/x86/kernel/x86_init.c)

Hi Konrad, I think currently lots of weak arch functions make MSI code
complex, we have following weak arch functions

arch_setup_msi_irqs
arch_setup_msi_irq
arch_msi_check_device
arch_teardown_msi_irqs
arch_teardown_msi_irq
arch_restore_msi_irqs
arch_msi_mask_irq
arch_msix_mask_irq

And Thierry Reding and Thomas Petazzoni introduce a new MSI chip infrastructure which
is used in arm platform now. Use msi_chip let us focus on implementing msi_chip ops functions(no need to implement all),
but now, we should know much of MSI enable flow, then override the weak functions.
I think use the unified MSI framework in all platforms is better.
Also this series is preparation to support Non-PCI MSI device use common MSI framework in linux. Non-PCI MSI devices
include hpet, dmar and the coming consolidator(introduced in ARM GICv3 spec, which is similar to MSI relay device).


Thanks!
Yijing.

>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/include/asm/pci.h | 1 +
>> arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++----
>> 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/pci.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/pci.h
>> index 0892ea0..878a06d 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/pci.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/pci.h
>> @@ -101,6 +101,7 @@ void native_teardown_msi_irq(unsigned int irq);
>> void native_restore_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev);
>> int setup_msi_irq(struct pci_dev *dev, struct msi_desc *msidesc,
>> unsigned int irq_base, unsigned int irq_offset);
>> +extern struct msi_chip *x86_msi_chip;
>> #else
>> #define native_setup_msi_irqs NULL
>> #define native_teardown_msi_irq NULL
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
>> index 2609dcd..eb8ab7c 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
>> @@ -3077,24 +3077,25 @@ int setup_msi_irq(struct pci_dev *dev, struct msi_desc *msidesc,
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> -int native_setup_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev, int nvec, int type)
>> +int native_setup_msi_irqs(struct device *dev, int nvec, int type)
>> {
>> struct msi_desc *msidesc;
>> unsigned int irq;
>> int node, ret;
>> + struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
>>
>> /* Multiple MSI vectors only supported with interrupt remapping */
>> if (type == PCI_CAP_ID_MSI && nvec > 1)
>> return 1;
>>
>> - node = dev_to_node(&dev->dev);
>> + node = dev_to_node(dev);
>>
>> - list_for_each_entry(msidesc, &dev->msi_list, list) {
>> + list_for_each_entry(msidesc, &pdev->msi_list, list) {
>> irq = irq_alloc_hwirq(node);
>> if (!irq)
>> return -ENOSPC;
>>
>> - ret = setup_msi_irq(dev, msidesc, irq, 0);
>> + ret = setup_msi_irq(pdev, msidesc, irq, 0);
>> if (ret < 0) {
>> irq_free_hwirq(irq);
>> return ret;
>> @@ -3214,6 +3215,17 @@ int default_setup_hpet_msi(unsigned int irq, unsigned int id)
>> }
>> #endif
>>
>> +struct msi_chip apic_msi_chip = {
>> + .setup_irqs = native_setup_msi_irqs,
>> + .teardown_irq = native_teardown_msi_irq,
>> +};
>> +
>> +struct msi_chip *arch_get_match_msi_chip(struct device *dev)
>> +{
>> + return x86_msi_chip;
>> +}
>> +
>> +struct msi_chip *x86_msi_chip = &apic_msi_chip;
>> #endif /* CONFIG_PCI_MSI */
>> /*
>> * Hypertransport interrupt support
>> --
>> 1.7.1
>>
>
> .
>


--
Thanks!
Yijing



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-08-13 03:41    [W:0.052 / U:0.208 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site