Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Viresh Kumar <> | Subject | [RFC 5/7] futex: don't check for active hrtimer after adding it | Date | Wed, 9 Jul 2014 12:25:37 +0530 |
| |
hrtimer_start*() family never fails to enqueue a hrtimer to a clock-base. The only special case is when the hrtimer was in past. If it is getting enqueued to local CPUs's clock-base, we raise a softirq and exit, else we handle that on next interrupt on remote CPU.
At several places in the kernel, we try to make sure if hrtimer was added properly or not by calling hrtimer_active(), like:
hrtimer_start(timer, expires, mode); if (hrtimer_active(timer)) { /* Added successfully */ } else { /* Was added in the past */ }
As hrtimer_start*() never fails, hrtimer_active() is guaranteed to return '1'. So, there is no point calling hrtimer_active().
This patch updates futex core to get this fixed.
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> --- kernel/futex.c | 5 +---- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/futex.c b/kernel/futex.c index b632b5f..4847efc 100644 --- a/kernel/futex.c +++ b/kernel/futex.c @@ -2083,11 +2083,8 @@ static void futex_wait_queue_me(struct futex_hash_bucket *hb, struct futex_q *q, queue_me(q, hb); /* Arm the timer */ - if (timeout) { + if (timeout) hrtimer_start_expires(&timeout->timer, HRTIMER_MODE_ABS); - if (!hrtimer_active(&timeout->timer)) - timeout->task = NULL; - } /* * If we have been removed from the hash list, then another task -- 2.0.0.rc2
| |