Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 9 Jul 2014 09:42:42 -0700 | From | "Paul E. McKenney" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/1] rcu: use true/false instead of 1/0 for a bool type |
| |
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 12:08:17AM -0400, Pranith Kumar wrote: > One more bool type change which I found while reading the code. > > Use true/false instead of 0/1 for a bool type > > Signed-off-by: Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@gmail.com>
Queued for 3.18, thank you!
Thanx, Paul
> --- > kernel/rcu/tree.c | 6 +++--- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c > index 1b70cb6..bc7b6f1 100644 > --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c > +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c > @@ -1668,7 +1668,7 @@ static int rcu_gp_fqs(struct rcu_state *rsp, int fqs_state_in) > if (fqs_state == RCU_SAVE_DYNTICK) { > /* Collect dyntick-idle snapshots. */ > if (is_sysidle_rcu_state(rsp)) { > - isidle = 1; > + isidle = true; > maxj = jiffies - ULONG_MAX / 4; > } > force_qs_rnp(rsp, dyntick_save_progress_counter, > @@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ static int rcu_gp_fqs(struct rcu_state *rsp, int fqs_state_in) > fqs_state = RCU_FORCE_QS; > } else { > /* Handle dyntick-idle and offline CPUs. */ > - isidle = 0; > + isidle = false; > force_qs_rnp(rsp, rcu_implicit_dynticks_qs, &isidle, &maxj); > } > /* Clear flag to prevent immediate re-entry. */ > @@ -2449,7 +2449,7 @@ static void force_qs_rnp(struct rcu_state *rsp, > for (; cpu <= rnp->grphi; cpu++, bit <<= 1) { > if ((rnp->qsmask & bit) != 0) { > if ((rnp->qsmaskinit & bit) != 0) > - *isidle = 0; > + *isidle = false; > if (f(per_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda, cpu), isidle, maxj)) > mask |= bit; > } > -- > 1.9.1 >
| |