Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 8 Jul 2014 09:45:25 -0700 | From | Guenter Roeck <> | Subject | Re: Compile issues with se7206_defconfig |
| |
On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 10:08:46AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 6:03 AM, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote: > > On 07/07/2014 07:56 PM, Nick Krause wrote: > >> There seems to me a build issue with this config. I will paste my logs > >> for this build below this message. > >> Cheers Nick > >> scripts/mod/empty.c:1:0: error: cannot use atomic model soft-imask in user > >> mode > >> /* empty file to figure out endianness / word size */ > >> ^ > >> make[2]: *** [scripts/mod/empty.o] Error 1 > >> make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... > >> make[1]: *** [scripts/mod] Error 2 > >> make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... > >> CHK include/generated/utsrelease.h > >> UPD include/generated/utsrelease.h > >> Generating include/generated/machtypes.h > >> CC kernel/bounds.s > >> kernel/bounds.c:1:0: error: cannot use atomic model soft-imask in user > >> mode > >> /* > >> ^ > >> make[1]: *** [kernel/bounds.s] Error 1 > >> make: *** [prepare0] Error 2 > >> make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... > >> make: *** [scripts] Error 2 > > > > What kernel version ? I see a build failure in mainline, but it is > > different. > > Indeed. > > > net/built-in.o: In function `__sk_run_filter': > > filter.c:(.text+0x3156c): undefined reference to `__fpscr_values' > > filter.c:(.text+0x31760): undefined reference to `__fpscr_values' > > filter.c:(.text+0x31c8c): undefined reference to `__fpscr_values' > > filter.c:(.text+0x31f00): undefined reference to `__fpscr_values' > > filter.c:(.text+0x323b0): undefined reference to `__fpscr_values' > > Toolchain issue: the compiler doesn't recognize the option to disable > the FPU, so it isn't passed, cfr. > www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg278300.html >
Seems that similar problems were fixed earlier without requiring a toolchain change. What is different this time (besides the apparent difficulty to build a new toolchain) ? Or am I missing something ?
Thanks, Guenter
| |