Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 04 Jul 2014 20:05:47 +0900 | From | AKASHI Takahiro <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v10 1/3] arm64: Add __NR_* definitions for compat syscalls |
| |
Arnd,
On 07/04/2014 07:06 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Friday 04 July 2014 16:28:29 AKASHI Takahiro wrote: >> From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> >> >> This patch adds __NR_* definitions to asm/unistd32.h, moves the >> __NR_compat_* definitions to asm/unistd.h and removes all the explicit >> unistd32.h includes apart from the one building the compat syscall >> table. The aim is to have the compat __NR_* definitions available but >> without colliding with the native syscall definitions. >> >> And adds more syscall definitions for 3.16. > > Can you explain in more detail why you want to add those macros? I've > looked at all three patches in the series but can't find any code using > them.
Right. "unistd32.h" is not used by this patch, but by lib/compat_audit.c. when I thought of adding audit support for arm64, there was duplicated code of auditing compat system calls across many architectures. lib/compat_audit.c fixes this issue but at the same time it also requires __NR_* macros for a couple of compat system calls which arm64 didn't have.
In the first implementation, I generated an extra generated/asm/unistd_32.h from the original asm/unist32.h by using a sed script. But Catalin suggested (agreed?) to modify unistd32.h for this purpose.
See http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-January/228992.html
Thanks, -Takahiro AKASHI
> I would expect that we don't need to define those macros at all for > compat mode, since they are meant primarily for user space (glibc) > compilation, which gets them from arch/arm/include/asm/unistd.h. > > Arnd >
| |