Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 31 Jul 2014 15:07:18 +0200 | From | Tomasz Figa <> | Subject | Re: [PATCHv2 5/5] clk: samsung: exynos5410: Added clocks DPLL, EPLL, IPLL, and VPLL |
| |
Hi Humberto,
You can find my comments inline.
On 31.07.2014 13:22, Humberto Silva Naves wrote: > Added the remaining PLL clocks, and also added the configuration > tables with the PLL coefficients for the supported frequencies. > These frequency tables are only installed when a 24MHz clock is > supplied as the input clock source. To reflect these changes, new > constants were added to the dt-bindings file.
[snip]
> +static struct samsung_pll_rate_table apll_24mhz_tbl[] __initdata = { > + /* sorted in descending order */ > + /* PLL_35XX_RATE(rate, m, p, s) */ > + PLL_35XX_RATE(2100000000, 175, 2, 0), > + PLL_35XX_RATE(2000000000, 250, 3, 0), > + PLL_35XX_RATE(1900000000, 475, 6, 0), > + PLL_35XX_RATE(1800000000, 225, 3, 0), > + PLL_35XX_RATE(1700000000, 425, 6, 0), > + PLL_35XX_RATE(1600000000, 200, 3, 0), > + PLL_35XX_RATE(1500000000, 250, 4, 0), > + PLL_35XX_RATE(1400000000, 175, 3, 0), > + PLL_35XX_RATE(1300000000, 325, 6, 0), > + PLL_35XX_RATE(1200000000, 100, 2, 0), > + PLL_35XX_RATE(1100000000, 275, 3, 1), > + PLL_35XX_RATE(1000000000, 250, 3, 1), > + PLL_35XX_RATE(900000000, 150, 2, 1), > + PLL_35XX_RATE(800000000, 200, 3, 1), > + PLL_35XX_RATE(700000000, 175, 3, 1), > + PLL_35XX_RATE(600000000, 100, 2, 1), > + PLL_35XX_RATE(500000000, 250, 3, 2), > + PLL_35XX_RATE(400000000, 200, 3, 2), > + PLL_35XX_RATE(300000000, 100, 2, 2), > + PLL_35XX_RATE(200000000, 200, 3, 3),
nit: The numbers could be aligned to the right using spaces (see exynos4.c).
> + { }, > +}; > + > +static struct samsung_pll_rate_table cpll_24mhz_tbl[] __initdata = { > + /* sorted in descending order */ > + /* PLL_35XX_RATE(rate, m, p, s) */ > + PLL_35XX_RATE(666000000, 222, 4, 1), > + PLL_35XX_RATE(640000000, 160, 3, 1), > + PLL_35XX_RATE(320000000, 160, 3, 2), > + { }, > +}; > + > +static struct samsung_pll_rate_table dpll_24mhz_tbl[] __initdata = { > + /* sorted in descending order */ > + /* PLL_35XX_RATE(rate, m, p, s) */ > + PLL_35XX_RATE(600000000, 200, 4, 1), > + { }, > +}; > + > +static struct samsung_pll_rate_table epll_24mhz_tbl[] __initdata = { > + /* sorted in descending order */ > + /* PLL_36XX_RATE(rate, m, p, s, k) */ > + PLL_36XX_RATE(600000000, 100, 2, 1, 0), > + PLL_36XX_RATE(400000000, 200, 3, 2, 0), > + PLL_36XX_RATE(200000000, 200, 3, 3, 0), > + PLL_36XX_RATE(180633600, 301, 5, 3, -3670), > + PLL_36XX_RATE( 67737600, 452, 5, 5, -27263), > + PLL_36XX_RATE( 49152000, 197, 3, 5, -25690), > + PLL_36XX_RATE( 45158401, 181, 3, 5, -24012),
Have you ensured that the rates specified match the rates calculated using PLL equation? You can find how it is calculated in recalc_rate callback of this particular PLL type in clk-pll.c.
As a side note, the PLL registration code should be made a bit more robust and just calculate the rates itself and printing warnings if they don't match the entered ones. I definitely need more hours in a day, so much to do. ;)
> + { }, > +}; > + > +static struct samsung_pll_rate_table ipll_24mhz_tbl[] __initdata = { > + /* sorted in descending order */ > + /* PLL_35XX_RATE(rate, m, p, s, k) */ > + PLL_35XX_RATE(864000000, 288, 4, 1), > + PLL_35XX_RATE(666000000, 222, 4, 1), > + PLL_35XX_RATE(432000000, 288, 4, 2), > + { }, > +}; > + > +static struct samsung_pll_rate_table kpll_24mhz_tbl[] __initdata = { > + /* sorted in descending order */ > + /* PLL_35XX_RATE(rate, m, p, s) */ > + PLL_35XX_RATE(1500000000, 250, 4, 0), > + PLL_35XX_RATE(1400000000, 175, 3, 0), > + PLL_35XX_RATE(1300000000, 325, 6, 0), > + PLL_35XX_RATE(1200000000, 100, 2, 0), > + PLL_35XX_RATE(1100000000, 275, 3, 1), > + PLL_35XX_RATE(1000000000, 250, 3, 1), > + PLL_35XX_RATE(900000000, 150, 2, 1), > + PLL_35XX_RATE(800000000, 200, 3, 1), > + PLL_35XX_RATE(700000000, 175, 3, 1), > + PLL_35XX_RATE(600000000, 100, 2, 1), > + PLL_35XX_RATE(500000000, 250, 3, 2), > + PLL_35XX_RATE(400000000, 200, 3, 2), > + PLL_35XX_RATE(300000000, 100, 2, 2), > + PLL_35XX_RATE(200000000, 200, 3, 3),
nit: Alignment.
Otherwise looks good, thanks.
Best regards, Tomasz
| |