lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Jul]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu] Parallelize and economize NOCB kthread wakeups
From
Date
On Wed, 2014-07-02 at 22:21 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: 
> On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 05:31:19AM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:

> > NO_HZ_FULL is a property of a set of CPUs. isolcpus is supposed to go
> > away as being a redundant interface to manage a single property of a set
> > of CPUs, but it's perfectly fine for NO_HZ_FULL to add an interface to
> > manage a single property of a set of CPUs. What am I missing?
>
> Well, for now, it can only be specified at build time or at boot time.
> In theory, it is possible to change a CPU from being callback-offloaded
> to not at runtime, but there would need to be an extremely good reason
> for adding that level of complexity. Lots of "fun" races in there...

Yeah, understood.

(still it's a NO_HZ_FULL wart though IMHO, would be prettier and more
usable if it eventually became unified with cpuset and learned how to
tap-dance properly;)

-Mike



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-07-03 08:21    [W:0.081 / U:0.420 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site