Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 25 Jul 2014 20:04:17 +0530 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 00/14] cpufreq: cpu0: Extend support beyond CPU0, V2 | From | Viresh Kumar <> |
| |
On 25 July 2014 19:59, Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com> wrote: > A temporary solution would have to be NOT in DT because once you add > something into DT you are stuck with it for some time. You could
I agree..
> simply support independent clocks by looking at the platform type, but > that is still risky since you may want to define the OPP in DT > differently for the 2 cases.
Or because we are going to create platform devices for now, lets have some platform data for cpufreq-cpu0 ?
> The other problem with temporary solutions is once they are accepted, > people loose motivation to create the permanent solution. "Can you > take this now and I'll fix the issues later" is a red flag to > maintainers.
I completely agree, but there are few points here which might make the red flag yellow if not green :) - I co-maintain this framework and so I do care about it :) - Even with the temporary stuff the solution wouldn't be complete for platforms with multiple clusters having separate clock lines.
| |