lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Jul]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Scheduler regression from caffcdd8d27ba78730d5540396ce72ad022aff2c
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 08:01:26AM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> build_sched_domain: cpu: 0 level: SMT cpu_map: 0-3 tl->mask: 0,2
> [ 0.254433] build_sched_domain: cpu: 0 level: MC cpu_map: 0-3 tl->mask: 0
> [ 0.254516] build_sched_domain: cpu: 0 level: DIE cpu_map: 0-3 tl->mask: 0-3
> [ 0.254600] build_sched_domain: cpu: 1 level: SMT cpu_map: 0-3 tl->mask: 1,3
> [ 0.254683] build_sched_domain: cpu: 1 level: MC cpu_map: 0-3 tl->mask: 1
> [ 0.254766] build_sched_domain: cpu: 1 level: DIE cpu_map: 0-3 tl->mask: 0-3
> [ 0.254850] build_sched_domain: cpu: 2 level: SMT cpu_map: 0-3 tl->mask: 0,2
> [ 0.254932] build_sched_domain: cpu: 2 level: MC cpu_map: 0-3 tl->mask: 2
> [ 0.255005] build_sched_domain: cpu: 2 level: DIE cpu_map: 0-3 tl->mask: 0-3
> [ 0.255091] build_sched_domain: cpu: 3 level: SMT cpu_map: 0-3 tl->mask: 1,3
> [ 0.255176] build_sched_domain: cpu: 3 level: MC cpu_map: 0-3 tl->mask: 3
> [ 0.255260] build_sched_domain: cpu: 3 level: DIE cpu_map: 0-3 tl->mask: 0-3

*blink*...

That's, shall we say, unexpected. Let me ponder that a bit. HPA any clue
why a machine might report such a weird topology? AFAIK threads _always_
share cache. So how can cpu_coregroup_mask be a subset (instead of a
superset) of topology_thread_cpumask?

Let me go stare at the x86 topology mask setup code.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-07-18 17:41    [W:0.418 / U:0.196 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site