lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Jul]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/1] [SCSI] Fix a bug in deriving the FLUSH_TIMEOUT from the basic I/O timeout
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 12:51:06AM +0000, Elliott, Robert (Server Storage) wrote:
> SYNCHRONIZE CACHE (16) should be favored over SYNCHRONIZE
> CACHE (10) unless SYNCHRONIZE CACHE (10) is not supported.

I gues you mean (16) for the last occurance? What's the benefit of
using SYNCHRONIZE CACHE (16) if we don't pass a LBA range?



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-07-18 17:41    [W:0.079 / U:0.180 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site