Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 10 Jul 2014 17:47:28 +0300 | From | Dmitry Kasatkin <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v6 0/6] ima: extending secure boot certificate chain of trust |
| |
Hi David,
If patches from integrity/next-trusted-keys goes via your tree, then I suggest that you re-base your patches on the top of our patchset, because it is unclear how long review of PE, PKCS7 patches will take and if they will be pulled...
I would do it with different pull requests.
- Dmitry
On 10/07/14 00:29, Mimi Zohar wrote: > On Wed, 2014-07-09 at 19:56 +0100, David Howells wrote: >> Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: >> >>> Yes, that's fine. My concern, however, is that the trusted keyring >>> patches are independent of the other patches being upstreamed and should >>> be upstreamed regardless of the other patches. >> There is overlap in the X.509 certificate request function that you took from >> my pkcs#7 patches. > Right, x509_request_asymmetric_key() is the same as > pkcs7_request_asymmetric_key(). > > Mimi > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >
| |