Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 09 Jun 2014 16:17:49 -0700 | From | Srinivas Pandruvada <> | Subject | Re: HID: hid-sensor-hub: fix sleeping function called from invalid context |
| |
On 06/09/2014 03:40 PM, Jiri Kosina wrote: > On Tue, 10 Jun 2014, Alexander Holler wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> while rebasing the dozens (currently around 60) of refused, ignored or >> similiar bugfixes and patches I need to use a Linux kernel, I've noticed that >> Jiri Kosinas patch here >> >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/8/9/214 >> >> doesn't apply anymore. >> >> Looking why, I've seen that a similiar patch from Srinivas Pandruvada named >> like the topic ended up in the kernel. > > Hi Alexander, > > thanks for drawing this one from the boulevard of forgotten patches. > > I am actually not aware of any patch by Srinivas that would conflict with > the one I've written -- could you please elaborate where you believe the > conflict is? > >> Looking at the differences, I wonder if not all spin_lock() calls in >> hid-sensor-hub.c should be changed into spin_lock_irqsave() like the >> patch from Jiri Kosina did. >
There is a patch submitted by "reyad.attiyat@gmail.com" [PATCH] HID: hid-sensor-hub: Fix lockdep warning for dynamic callback locks.
Already doing this, what you suggested?
+Reyad
Thanks, Srinivas
> Could you please give me your Tested-by:? I'll then be happily queuing the > fix. Thanks. > >> (sorry for the duplicate message, I've forgotten to add the >> wanna-be-reviewer-school named lkml to the recipients) > > You want to make it to LWN quotes of the week, don't you? :) >
| |