| Date | Tue, 10 Jun 2014 01:19:11 +0200 (CEST) | From | Thomas Gleixner <> | Subject | Re: [Patch V4 08/42] x86, ACPI, irq: enhance error handling in function acpi_register_gsi() |
| |
On Mon, 9 Jun 2014, Jiang Liu wrote:
> Function mp_register_gsi() may return invalid GSI if error happens, > so enhance acpi_register_gsi() to handle possible error cases.
Can you please explain how that happens? I think I know it, but it'd be nice if it would be documented.
> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> > --- > arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c | 10 ++++++---- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c > index 392360c607dc..f201579cd0df 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c > @@ -97,6 +97,8 @@ static u32 isa_irq_to_gsi[NR_IRQS_LEGACY] __read_mostly = { > 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 > }; > > +#define ACPI_INVALID_GSI INT_MIN > + > static unsigned int gsi_to_irq(unsigned int gsi) > { > unsigned int irq = gsi + NR_IRQS_LEGACY; > @@ -441,7 +443,7 @@ static int mp_register_gsi(struct device *dev, u32 gsi, int trigger, > polarity == ACPI_ACTIVE_HIGH ? 0 : 1); > ret = io_apic_set_pci_routing(dev, gsi_to_irq(gsi), &irq_attr); > if (ret < 0) > - gsi = INT_MIN; > + gsi = ACPI_INVALID_GSI; > > return gsi; > } > @@ -666,13 +668,13 @@ int (*acpi_suspend_lowlevel)(void); > */ > int acpi_register_gsi(struct device *dev, u32 gsi, int trigger, int polarity) > { > - unsigned int irq; > unsigned int plat_gsi = gsi;
The assignemend of gsi to plat_gsi is pointless
> plat_gsi = (*__acpi_register_gsi)(dev, gsi, trigger, polarity);
__acpi_register_gsi is a function pointer, so
plat_gsi = __acpi_register_gsi(dev, gsi, trigger, polarity);
is completely correct and way simpler to read.
> - irq = gsi_to_irq(plat_gsi); > + if (plat_gsi != ACPI_INVALID_GSI) > + return gsi_to_irq(plat_gsi); > > - return irq; > + return -1; > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_register_gsi);
No need to repost the whole series. Just reply with a new version to this.
Thanks,
tglx
|