Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 25 Jun 2014 14:33:56 +0200 | From | Marek Szyprowski <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 -next 0/9] CMA: generalize CMA reserved area management code |
| |
Hello,
On 2014-06-18 22:51, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 10:25:07 +0900 Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> wrote: >>>> v2: >>>> - Although this patchset looks very different with v1, the end result, >>>> that is, mm/cma.c is same with v1's one. So I carry Ack to patch 6-7. >>>> >>>> This patchset is based on linux-next 20140610. >>> Thanks for taking care of this. I will test it with my setup and if >>> everything goes well, I will take it to my -next tree. If any branch >>> is required for anyone to continue his works on top of those patches, >>> let me know, I will also prepare it. >> Hello, >> >> I'm glad to hear that. :) >> But, there is one concern. As you already know, I am preparing further >> patches (Aggressively allocate the pages on CMA reserved memory). It >> may be highly related to MM branch and also slightly depends on this CMA >> changes. In this case, what is the best strategy to merge this >> patchset? IMHO, Anrew's tree is more appropriate branch. If there is >> no issue in this case, I am willing to develope further patches based >> on your tree. > That's probably easier. Marek, I'll merge these into -mm (and hence > -next and git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mhocko/mm.git) > and shall hold them pending you review/ack/test/etc, OK?
Ok. I've tested them and they work fine. I'm sorry that you had to wait for me for a few days. You can now add:
Acked-and-tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
I've also rebased my pending patches onto this set (I will send them soon).
The question is now if you want to keep the discussed patches in your -mm tree, or should I take them to my -next branch. If you like to keep them, I assume you will also take the patches which depends on the discussed changes.
Best regards -- Marek Szyprowski, PhD Samsung R&D Institute Poland
| |