lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Jun]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Checks for Null return of skb_alloc in function fw_download_code
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 01:53:00PM -0400, Nicholas Krause wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Krause <xerofoify@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/r8192E_firmware.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/r8192E_firmware.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/r8192E_firmware.c
> index 11e915e..fde17ff 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/r8192E_firmware.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/r8192E_firmware.c
> @@ -62,12 +62,15 @@ static bool fw_download_code(struct net_device *dev, u8 *code_virtual_address,
>
> skb = dev_alloc_skb(frag_length + 4);
> + if (!skb) {
> + rt_status = false;
> + return rt_status;
> +
> + }

Why 2 tabs for indentation? Does that look correct?

> memcpy((unsigned char *)(skb->cb), &dev, sizeof(dev));
> tcb_desc = (struct cb_desc *)(skb->cb + MAX_DEV_ADDR_SIZE);
> tcb_desc->queue_index = TXCMD_QUEUE;
> tcb_desc->bCmdOrInit = DESC_PACKET_TYPE_INIT;
> tcb_desc->bLastIniPkt = bLastIniPkt;
> - }
>
> seg_ptr = skb->data;
> for (i = 0; i < frag_length; i += 4) {

Also, this patch still fails to apply, what tree did you make it
against? A "clean" 3.16-rc1 tree, or your own tree with other changes
in it?

greg k-h


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-06-18 20:21    [W:0.043 / U:0.524 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site