lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [May]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/2] sched: Fix next_balance logic in rebalance_domains() and idle_balance()
From
Date
On Fri, 2014-05-09 at 11:08 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 05:49:22PM -0700, Jason Low wrote:
> > On Thu, 2014-05-08 at 15:14 -0700, Jason Low wrote:
> > > Hi Ingo, Peter,
> > >
> > > Were there NULL domains on the test system? If so, I think we can
> > > address the problem by doing update_next_balance() only if the below
> > > rcu_dereference_check_sched_domain() returns a non-null domain.
> >
> > Also, below is a patch which has the change:
> >
>
> Thanks, and yes, NULL domains are a perfectly normal thing to have
> (though not common on normal boot paths).

Okay. Likewise, on my test machine, I offline all but 1 CPU
in order to try reproducing the issue.

Thanks,
Jason



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-05-09 20:21    [W:0.096 / U:0.320 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site