Messages in this thread | | | From | Andreas Schwab <> | Subject | Re: [RFC 01/32] fs: introduce new 'struct inode_time' | Date | Sat, 31 May 2014 15:46:42 +0200 |
| |
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> writes:
> "int" is signed, right? Or do you mean a bitfield needs an explicit "signed" > keyword to be signed?
Yes, see 6.7.2#5.
Andreas.
-- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."
| |