lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [May]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Resume from suspend broken in 3.15. (bisected)
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 08:26:53PM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 7:49 PM, Ken Moffat <zarniwhoop@ntlworld.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 06:25:21PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
> >> Hi Daniel,
> >>
> >
> > [ correcting details, confirming that reverting this does fix the
> > problem, adding Cc:s ]
> >
> >> I've only started full testing of 3.15 on one of my machines now
> >> that -rc7 has been released (this one had two issues in the radeon
> >> code, second was fixed in rc7). Unfortunately, suspend to RAM
> >> (pm-suspend), or rather the wake-up, is broken on this box [ my
> >> other two boxes are fine in rc7 ].
> >>
> >> Bisection identified one of your commits -
> >>
> >> commit 25f397a429dfa43f22c278d0119a60a343aa568f
> >> Author: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> >> Date: Fri Jul 19 18:57:11 2013 +0200
> >>
> >> drm/crtc-helper: explicit DPMS on after modeset
> >>
> >> Atm the crtc helper implementation of set_config has really
> >> inconsisten semantics: If just an fb update is good enough, dpms state
> >> will be left as-is, but if we do a full modeset we force everything to
> >> dpms on.
> >>
> >> This change has already been applied to the i915 modeset code in
> >>
> >> ('git show' stops at that point)
> >
> > update : I've no idea what was going on there, nor for the problem
> > with attempting to revert it. I've now gone back into git,
> > extracted the full commit to a file with 'git show', and then used
> > git apply -R to revert it from 3.15-rc7. That version wakes up from
> > suspend to RAM, 3.15-rc7 itself did not.
> >
> > Maybe I was still in git log when I thought I was on the command
> > line. Anyway, snipping git's view of my failed attempt to revert
> > it, and adding Dan and Alex who were CC'd on the commit.
> >
>
> Duplicate of:
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=74751
> and also reported here:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/5/2/388
> Unless there is a good reason to keep the commit, I'd say let's just revert it.
>

Yes. Let's revert it.

regards,
dan carpenter



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-05-29 08:41    [W:0.296 / U:0.028 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site