lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [May]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 16/18] x86: io: implement dummy relaxed accessor macros for writes
    On 05/23/2014 07:46 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
    >
    > I would like the relaxed accessors to be ordered with respect to each other...
    >
    > What do you think?
    >

    I think "I would like" isn't a very good motivation. What are the
    semantics of these things supposed to be? It seems more than a bit odd
    to require them to be ordered with respect to each other and everything
    else (which is what a memory clobber does) and then call them "relaxed".

    -hpa




    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2014-05-23 18:41    [W:3.057 / U:0.788 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site