lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [May]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/3] Shrinkers and proportional reclaim
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 12:14:16AM +0800, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 10:09:36AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > This series is aimed at regressions noticed during reclaim activity. The
> > first two patches are shrinker patches that were posted ages ago but never
> > merged for reasons that are unclear to me. I'm posting them again to see if
> > there was a reason they were dropped or if they just got lost. Dave? Time?
> > The last patch adjusts proportional reclaim. Yuanhan Liu, can you retest
> > the vm scalability test cases on a larger machine? Hugh, does this work
> > for you on the memcg test cases?
>
> Sure, and here is the result. I applied these 3 patches on v3.15-rc6,
> and head commit is 60c10afd. e82e0561 is the old commit that introduced
> the regression. The testserver has 512G memory and 120 CPU.
>
> It's a simple result; if you need more data, I can gather them and send
> it to you tomorrow:
>
> e82e0561 v3.15-rc6 60c10afd
> ----------------------------------------
> 18560785 12232122 38868453
> -34% +109
>
> As you can see, the performance is back, and it is way much better ;)
>

Thanks a lot for that and the quick response. It is much appreciated.

--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-05-22 23:21    [W:0.089 / U:1.764 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site