Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 21 May 2014 14:39:35 -0700 | Subject | Re: [GIT PULL] at91: DT for 3.16 #2 | From | Olof Johansson <> |
| |
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 2:11 PM, Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> wrote:
> I don't agree with everything above, but it's not worth arguing for the > sake of arguing. :) I think we can tweak what you're doing now and get > things to work well by merging new dts files with at91-<soc>-board.dts > as the name. As mentioned, don't worry about the existing files. This > shouldn't be a significiant change to what you've been telling people > since 3.10 to cause much confusion.
A the end of the day, as long as you have at91- as prefix we'll be OK I think.
If you can consistently add the SoC into the prefix as above, we'll be even better. But I'm not going to spend more time arguing it. :)
Either way, consistency (going forward) with at91- is good.
-Olof
| |