lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [May]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] kref: warn on uninitialized kref
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 06:53:17AM -0400, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> I found a memory leak in iSCSI target that was caused by kref initialized
> to zero (the memory object was allocated with kzalloc, kref_init was not
> called and kref_put_spinlock_irqsave was called which changed "0" to "-1"
> and didn't free the object).
>
> Similar bugs may exist in other kernel areas, so I submit this patch that
> adds a check to kref.h. If the value is zero or negative, we can assume
> that it is uninitialized and we warn about it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
>
> ---
> include/linux/kref.h | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Index: linux-3.15-rc5/include/linux/kref.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-3.15-rc5.orig/include/linux/kref.h 2013-07-02 22:23:38.000000000 +0200
> +++ linux-3.15-rc5/include/linux/kref.h 2014-05-16 18:56:18.000000000 +0200
> @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ static inline int kref_sub(struct kref *
> void (*release)(struct kref *kref))
> {
> WARN_ON(release == NULL);
> -
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(atomic_read(&kref->refcount) <= 0);
> if (atomic_sub_and_test((int) count, &kref->refcount)) {
> release(kref);
> return 1;
> @@ -119,6 +119,7 @@ static inline int kref_put_spinlock_irqs
> unsigned long flags;
>
> WARN_ON(release == NULL);
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(atomic_read(&kref->refcount) <= 0);
> if (atomic_add_unless(&kref->refcount, -1, 1))
> return 0;
> spin_lock_irqsave(lock, flags);
> @@ -136,6 +137,7 @@ static inline int kref_put_mutex(struct
> struct mutex *lock)
> {
> WARN_ON(release == NULL);
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(atomic_read(&kref->refcount) <= 0);
> if (unlikely(!atomic_add_unless(&kref->refcount, -1, 1))) {
> mutex_lock(lock);
> if (unlikely(!atomic_dec_and_test(&kref->refcount))) {

This has a side effect of detecting some overputs, which is nice.

However, could be made better if kref_sub checked that refs you want to
take don't put the count below 0.

i.e.
WARN_ON(count > atomic_read(&kref->refcount));

this also detects your original problem.

--
Mateusz Guzik


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-05-17 13:41    [W:0.126 / U:0.572 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site