lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [May]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] dmaengine: qcom_bam_dma: Add descriptor flag APIs
On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 01:08:27PM -0500, Andy Gross wrote:
> On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 09:58:41PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 05:04:02PM -0500, Andy Gross wrote:
> > > This patch adds APIs that allow for BAM hardware flags to be set per
> > > descriptor. Each one of the new flags informs the attached peripheral of a
> > > special behavior that is required.
> > >
> > > The EOT flag requests that the peripheral assert an end of transaction interrupt
> > > when that descriptor is complete. It also results in special signaling protocol
> > > that is used between the attached peripheral and the core using the DMA
> > > controller.
> > DMA_PREP_INTERRUPT ??
>
> I have 3 different IRQs that can be asserted based on the bit I set in the
> hardware descriptor. The normal IRQ is the INT bit. However, in some cases the
> peripheral protocol requires the use of the EOT or EOB interrupt instead. The
> DMA_PREP_INTERRUPT would only work if I had only 2 choices.

Thinking about this more, I could use the DMA_PREP_INTERRUPT to cover the EOT
flag. However, I might get in a bind later if I need to support the EOB (end of
block) interrupt.

>
> >
> > >
> > > The NWD flag requests that the peripheral wait until the data has been fully
> > > processed before signaling an interrupt.
> > interrupt for transaction complete or DMA request?
>
> This is a special signaling mechanism that holds off the DMA interrupt until the
> peripheral actually acks that the data has been processed completely. This is
> required in many cases by the peripheral. One example is the SPI controller.
> At the end of a transaction you are supposed to set the NWD so that the chip
> select is de-asserted.

I'm not sure what flag I could map this to... maybe DMA_CTRL_ACK? or maybe the
DMA_PREP_FENCE? I don't generally like overloading the flags and slightly
twisting their intent. Could we add a flag to denote device ACK?

--
sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-05-17 06:21    [W:0.089 / U:0.564 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site