Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 15 May 2014 11:40:57 +0530 | Subject | Re: [PATCH] PM / OPP: discard duplicate OPP additions | From | Inderpal Singh <> |
| |
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> wrote: > On 15 May 2014 11:16, Inderpal Singh <inderpal.s@samsung.com> wrote: >> I think I did not make myself clear. > > Probably I was the one who got confused :) > >> Devfreq will have its own opp table associated with its own device. It >> does not uses the opp table of cpus. >> Hence there may be need to free the table if driver (at least devfreq) >> getting un-registered. > > We may have an unregister routine routine, I am not arguing about that. > But we don't need to call that for CPU's opp, that's it.. For devices it might > make sense to free memory.
Yes the provision should be there in the OPP framework and let the individual drivers decide whether to invoke or not.
> -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pm" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
| |