Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 15 May 2014 11:07:33 +0530 | Subject | Re: [PATCH] PM / OPP: discard duplicate OPP additions | From | Viresh Kumar <> |
| |
On 15 May 2014 11:00, Inderpal Singh <inderpal.s@samsung.com> wrote: > On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 10:34 AM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> wrote: >> On 15 May 2014 10:22, Inderpal Singh <inderpal.s@samsung.com> wrote: >> >>> What i am saying that "what if we are not going to re-use again ? " >> >> That's what I said: >> >> Yes, it will keep occupying some space but there is only one instance >> of that per 'cluster' and is very much affordable instead of building it again.. >> >> So, we may not need to free it. > > Its not just about cpufreq. There may be others using OPPs as well. > For example devfreq.
And who is stopping these to use the already built ones? Exactly for this reason I have been saying that lets not free OPPs already built. Devfreq can simply use the ones built by cpufreq, even if cpufreq isn't using it anymore.
| |