Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 15 May 2014 07:14:30 -0500 | Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Frequency resolution in CCF vs. cpufreq | From | Nishanth Menon <> |
| |
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 2:47 AM, Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> wrote: [...] >> cpufreq, which simply divides values it obtains through clk_round_rate() by >> 1000, 666666. >> Since passing 666666 to clk_round_rate() does not result in 666666660 >> (clk_round_rate() always rounds down!), we chose to put 666667 in the OPP. This > What is OPP?
Operating Performance Point (Documentation/power/opp.txt describes frequencies in Hz, the bindings we chose in the community Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/opp.txt describes it in KHz).
Regards, Nishanth Menon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |