Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] random: Add "initialized" variable to proc | From | "H. Peter Anvin" <> | Date | Wed, 30 Apr 2014 22:37:00 -0700 |
| |
To do something cross-arch putting it in memory and having something point to it is probably easiest, but again, with an in-VM boot loader the command line rather sucks. This then becomes a matter for device tree/ACPI with all that entails.
In that sense it would be better to do something arch-specififc, because what is easy to do early is rather inherently arch-specific.
Sent from my tablet, pardon any formatting problems.
> On Apr 30, 2014, at 19:06, "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> wrote: > >> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 01:52:35PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >> >> 1. It simply doesn't work on my system. In particular, it never returns >> entropy. It just blocks forever. > > Why? Is this a bug in qemu? The host OS? The guest OS? It is qemu > trying to use /dev/random instead of /dev/urandom? Any thing else? > >> 3. There should be a way to provide some entropy-free cryptographically >> secure data, too. Regardless of the speed of the hosts's /dev/random, >> the guest should start with at least 256 bits of cryptographically >> secure seed material IMO. > > Well, the simplest way to do this is to pass it in via the command > line, and then have the the kernel make sure it gets obscured so it's > not exposed via /proc/cmdline. > > Otherwise we would have to define an extension where we pass 32 bytes > or so after the boot command line. But the downside of doing that is > we would have to modify every single architecture to define where > those 32 bytes could be found. > > Aside from passing it on the command line as being a bit grotty, the > other big problem this is that some architectures only have 256 bytes > of command line, and if we use a base 64 encoding, 256 bits will take > 43 characters. Not a problem on x86, and it seems rather unlikely > that people would want to virtualize a m68k or avr32 CPU. It just > feels really unclean. > > I've cc'ed Peter Anvin for his opinion about extending Linux boot > parameter protocol. I agree it would be a lot simpler and easier to > enable things like Kernel ASLR with real randomness on guest OS's if > we didn't have to erect the whole virtio-pci infrastructure during > early boot. :-) > > -Ted
| |