Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 8 Apr 2014 20:06:26 +0100 | From | Mel Gorman <> | Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Use an alternative to _PAGE_PROTNONE for _PAGE_NUMA v2 |
| |
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 11:55:22AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 11:51 AM, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> wrote: > > > > I picked a solution. The posted series uses a different bit. > > Yes, and I actually like that. I have nothing against your patch > series. I'm ranting and raving because you then seemed to say "maybe > we shouldn't pick a solution after all" when you said: > > > > If you are ok with leaving _PAGE_NUMA as _PAGE_PROTNONE > > which was what I reacted to. >
Ok, my bad. To be absolutly clear I want to move away from aliasing the _PAGE_PROTNONE bit. As David reports the series works for him, I'll wait a bit to see if there are objections or an alternative patch series from another direction. If not, I'll remove the RFC and repost it through the x86 maintainers.
-- Mel Gorman SUSE Labs
| |