lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Apr]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH regression] net: phy: fix initialization (config_init) for Marvel 88E1116R PHYs
Am 03.04.2014 17:14, schrieb David Miller:
> From: Alexander Holler <holler@ahsoftware.de>
> Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2014 17:06:52 +0200
>
>> But don't suggest me (or insist on) a time consuming
>
> Bisects are not time consuming, and help developers analyze your
> issue tremendously.

Hmm, compiling and booting several dozen kernels isn't time consuming?
Then I must have done something wrong in the past.

And I wonder why I've writen descriptions at all, if nobody wants to
understand that I already know the patch which leads to a broken network
on that system.

If the patch is really the reason for the problem, is something totally
different, but bisecting won't help here. Besides that I know since 4
years that netconsole is broken on that box, it just never broke the
network or anything else. And so I ignored it, foreseeing the necessary
time to debug and especially describe and discuss the problem.

You see, I'm already feeling like just talking with myself. But just in
case: After reverting patch 7cd1463, there exist a online-change to turn
on/off the problem:

------
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mv643xx_eth.c
b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mv643xx_eth.c
index e891b48..246f065 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mv643xx_eth.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mv643xx_eth.c
@@ -2095,7 +2095,8 @@ static void port_start(struct mv643xx_eth_private *mp)
struct ethtool_cmd cmd;

mv643xx_eth_get_settings(mp->dev, &cmd);
- phy_reset(mp);
+ //phy_reset(mp);
+ phy_init_hw(mp->phy);
mv643xx_eth_set_settings(mp->dev, &cmd);
phy_start(mp->phy);
}
------
Thats basically just what the reverted patch does. Now, why should I
still bisect?

Of course, my first assumption that the changed reset is the bug is
wrong, it just makes the problem to appear. But that wrong assumption
still doesn't make a bisect necessary. And it's discouraging if people
still insist on that.

I will see if I spend the time to write down a more detailed description
about what happens here.

Regards,

Alexander Holler


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-04-04 06:01    [W:0.171 / U:0.184 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site