Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 3 Apr 2014 10:53:30 +0100 | From | Mark Brown <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] ASoC: dapm: Add support for multi register mux |
| |
On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 11:47:15AM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> I'm a bit late in the game, but I feel a bit uneasy through looking > at the whole changes. My primary question is, whether do we really > need to share the same struct soc_enum for the onehot type? What > makes hard to use a struct soc_enum_onehot for them? You need > different individual get/put for each type. We may still need to > change soc_dapm_update stuff, but it's different from sharing > soc_enum.
Indeed, I had thought this was where the discussion was heading - not looked at this version of the patch yet. [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |