| From | Ben Hutchings <> | Date | Mon, 28 Apr 2014 02:11:21 +0100 | Subject | [PATCH 3.2 10/94] xen-netback: remove pointless clause from if statement |
| |
3.2.58-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@citrix.com>
[ Upstream commit 0576eddf24df716d8570ef8ca11452a9f98eaab2 ]
This patch removes a test in start_new_rx_buffer() that checks whether a copy operation is less than MAX_BUFFER_OFFSET in length, since MAX_BUFFER_OFFSET is defined to be PAGE_SIZE and the only caller of start_new_rx_buffer() already limits copy operations to PAGE_SIZE or less.
Signed-off-by: Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@citrix.com> Cc: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com> Cc: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com> Cc: Sander Eikelenboom <linux@eikelenboom.it> Reported-By: Sander Eikelenboom <linux@eikelenboom.it> Tested-By: Sander Eikelenboom <linux@eikelenboom.it> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> --- drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c @@ -346,8 +346,8 @@ static bool start_new_rx_buffer(int offs * into multiple copies tend to give large frags their * own buffers as before. */ - if ((offset + size > MAX_BUFFER_OFFSET) && - (size <= MAX_BUFFER_OFFSET) && offset && !head) + BUG_ON(size > MAX_BUFFER_OFFSET); + if ((offset + size > MAX_BUFFER_OFFSET) && offset && !head) return true; return false;
|