lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Apr]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH/RFC 3/4] of/clk: Register clocks suitable for Runtime PM with the PM core
Date
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> writes:

> When adding a device from DT, check if its clocks are suitable for Runtime
> PM, and register them with the PM core.
> If Runtime PM is disabled, just enable the clock.
>
> This allows the PM core to automatically manage gate clocks of devices for
> Runtime PM.

...unless the device is already in an existing pm_domain, right?

I like this approach, and it extends nicely what we already do on
platforms using drivers/base/power/clock_ops.c into DT land.

My only concern is how this will interact if it's used along with
devices that have existing pm_domains. I don't have any specific
concerns (yet, because it's Friday, and my brain is turing off), but it
just made me wonder if this will be potentially confusing.

Also...

[...]

> +static int of_clk_register(struct device *dev, struct clk *clk)
> +{
> + int error;
> +
> + if (!dev->pm_domain) {
> + error = pm_clk_create(dev);
> + if (error)
> + return error;
> +
> + dev->pm_domain = &of_clk_pm_domain;
> + }
> +
> + dev_dbg(dev, "Setting up clock for runtime PM management\n");
> + return pm_clk_add_clk(dev, clk);

I would've expected these 2 lines to be inside the pm_domain check.

What's the reason for doing the pm_clk_add() when the pm_domain isn't
going to be used? I suppose it's harmless, but it's a bit confusing.

Kevin


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-04-26 02:01    [W:0.195 / U:2.484 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site