lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Apr]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RESEND: RFC PATCH 3/3] pcie: keystone: add pcie driver based on designware core driver
On 4/2/2014 12:47 PM, Andrew Murray wrote:
> On 2 April 2014 16:43, Murali Karicheri <m-karicheri2@ti.com> wrote:
>
>> Keystone pcie driver is developed based on other dw based pcie drivers
>>
>> such as pci-exynos that uses subsys_initcall(). I am new to this list,
>>
>> probably Jingoo (copied) has some history on why we can't use module.
>> For now I will keep it as is and can be re-visited in the next revisions.
>> Also I will experiment with PCIE port driver as well.
>>
>>
>> BTW, PCIE driver currently uses Legacy or MSI IRQ. Keystone PCI has
>> a platform IRQ. Is DT based irq configuration is the appropriate way
>> to add this capability?
> As far as I am aware - the PCI standards define a particular way for
> devices to describe which interrupt will be used for things like
> hotplug, AER and PME. These interrupts are always PCI interrupts (i.e.
> MSI/MSI-X/legacy). Thus the port services code in the kernel uses
> standard configuration space accesses to determine the interrupt to
> use. Also note that it's not just the host bridge that can provide
> these services but any PCIE device, I guess in this sense a host
> bridge is treated like any other device.
>
> If my understanding is correct I don't believe the current port
> services code allows exceptions to this, i.e. to say this host bridge
> actually uses a platform IRQ for AER rather than an MSI. Though this
> may be quite useful as I suspect many host bridges provide interrupts
> for things like PME through platform IRQs rather that PCI interrupts.
>
> Does the Keystone have platform IRQs for things like AER? Is that
> because the IP makes these events available through platform IRQs in
> addition to the standard PCI means?
>
> Andrew Murray
Andrew,

Yes. Keystone PCIe hw is based on designware hw version v3.65 that
implements
Error interrupt as a platform IRQ only (not in addition) and
unfortunately standard
PCI means are not supported. The latter versions do support standard PCI
means.

Murali



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-04-02 20:01    [W:0.105 / U:1.544 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site