Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 18 Apr 2014 17:40:15 -0400 | From | Waiman Long <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v9 05/19] qspinlock: Optimize for smaller NR_CPUS |
| |
On 04/18/2014 03:05 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 01:52:50PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote: >> I am confused by your notation. > Nah, I think I was confused :-) Make the 1 _Q_LOCKED_VAL though, as > that's the proper constant to use.
Everyone gets confused once in a while:-) I have plenty of that myself.
I will change 1 to _Q_LOCKED_VAL as suggested.
-Longman
| |